{"product_id":"hugo-literature-reviewer-ai-skill","title":"Hugo — Literature Reviewer AI Skill","description":"\u003cdiv style=\"font-family: 'DM Sans', sans-serif; color: #1A1A18; max-width: 680px;\"\u003e\n\n  \u003cp style=\"font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; color: #1A1A18; line-height: 1.5; margin: 0 0 8px 0;\"\u003e\n    Drop Hugo into Claude and get a Literature Reviewer who designs review structures, identifies themes and debates across sources, writes thematically organised critical synthesis sections, produces gap analyses, and helps researchers move from a pile of papers to a coherent, scholarly argument about the state of the field.\n  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\n  \u003cp style=\"font-size: 13px; font-weight: 400; color: #555550; line-height: 1.7; margin: 0 0 28px 0;\"\u003e\n    A literature review is not a list of what each paper says — it is a structured argument about what the literature collectively shows, debates, and misses. Hugo is one of the most critically rigorous AI literature review tools available in Claude format — built for dissertation writers, systematic reviewers, and research professionals across medicine, social sciences, humanities, business, and policy. He always pushes toward synthesis over summary. He always asks what the papers mean, where they disagree, and what their limitations are. And he works with the sources you provide — he helps you design the search strategy to find them, not pretend to access databases live.\n  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\n  \u003cdiv style=\"background: #E8F6F9; border-radius: 12px; padding: 24px 28px; margin-bottom: 24px;\"\u003e\n    \u003cp style=\"font-size: 10px; font-weight: 600; color: #1A8FA8; letter-spacing: 0.08em; text-transform: uppercase; margin: 0 0 16px 0;\"\u003eWhat you get\u003c\/p\u003e\n    \u003cul style=\"margin: 0; padding: 0; list-style: none;\"\u003e\n      \u003cli style=\"font-size: 13px; color: #1A1A18; padding: 7px 0; border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(26,143,168,0.12); display: flex; align-items: flex-start; gap: 10px;\"\u003e\n        \u003cspan style=\"color: #1A8FA8; font-weight: 600; flex-shrink: 0;\"\u003e→\u003c\/span\u003e\n        \u003cspan\u003eLiterature review structure and planning — thematic, chronological, methodological, theoretical, and conceptual approach selection, inclusion and exclusion criteria definition, search strategy design using Boolean operators and database-specific terms (PubMed, Cochrane, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus), and argument flow planning before a word is written\u003c\/span\u003e\n      \u003c\/li\u003e\n      \u003cli style=\"font-size: 13px; color: #1A1A18; padding: 7px 0; border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(26,143,168,0.12); display: flex; align-items: flex-start; gap: 10px;\"\u003e\n        \u003cspan style=\"color: #1A8FA8; font-weight: 600; flex-shrink: 0;\"\u003e→\u003c\/span\u003e\n        \u003cspan\u003eTheme identification and source organisation — themes, debates, and schools of thought identified across your sources, comparative matrices for organising literature by theme, methodology, finding, or perspective, where sources agree and disagree mapped, and the evolution of thinking over time in a field charted\u003c\/span\u003e\n      \u003c\/li\u003e\n      \u003cli style=\"font-size: 13px; color: #1A1A18; padding: 7px 0; border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(26,143,168,0.12); display: flex; align-items: flex-start; gap: 10px;\"\u003e\n        \u003cspan style=\"color: #1A8FA8; font-weight: 600; flex-shrink: 0;\"\u003e→\u003c\/span\u003e\n        \u003cspan\u003eWritten literature review sections — thematically organised analytical paragraphs integrating multiple sources, critical analysis (not just what sources say but what they mean and whether they are credible and applicable), gap analysis sections identifying what has not been studied, and the rationale for why that gap matters\u003c\/span\u003e\n      \u003c\/li\u003e\n      \u003cli style=\"font-size: 13px; color: #1A1A18; padding: 7px 0; border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(26,143,168,0.12); display: flex; align-items: flex-start; gap: 10px;\"\u003e\n        \u003cspan style=\"color: #1A8FA8; font-weight: 600; flex-shrink: 0;\"\u003e→\u003c\/span\u003e\n        \u003cspan\u003eCritical source evaluation — methodology strength and limitation assessment, relevance and applicability to the current context, credibility (journal quality, sample size, bias, replicability), comparative findings analysis explaining why studies reach different conclusions, and recency assessment\u003c\/span\u003e\n      \u003c\/li\u003e\n      \u003cli style=\"font-size: 13px; color: #1A1A18; padding: 7px 0; border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(26,143,168,0.12); display: flex; align-items: flex-start; gap: 10px;\"\u003e\n        \u003cspan style=\"color: #1A8FA8; font-weight: 600; flex-shrink: 0;\"\u003e→\u003c\/span\u003e\n        \u003cspan\u003eSystematic review support — PRISMA flow diagram planning, PICO and SPIDER search strategy frameworks, data extraction template design, CASP and Cochrane quality assessment frameworks, and systematic review protocol structure for publication-standard reviews\u003c\/span\u003e\n      \u003c\/li\u003e\n      \u003cli style=\"font-size: 13px; color: #1A1A18; padding: 7px 0; display: flex; align-items: flex-start; gap: 10px;\"\u003e\n        \u003cspan style=\"color: #1A8FA8; font-weight: 600; flex-shrink: 0;\"\u003e→\u003c\/span\u003e\n        \u003cspan\u003eDiscipline-specific literature review formats — systematic and scoping reviews for medicine and health sciences, theoretical framework and empirical debate reviews for social sciences, historiography and theoretical positioning for humanities, practitioner and academic literature integration for business, and grey literature inclusion for policy briefs\u003c\/span\u003e\n      \u003c\/li\u003e\n    \u003c\/ul\u003e\n  \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n  \u003cdiv style=\"display: flex; align-items: center; gap: 20px; background: #FFFFFF; border: 1px solid #E8E6E0; border-radius: 8px; padding: 14px 20px; margin-bottom: 24px;\"\u003e\n    \u003cspan style=\"font-size: 11px; color: #888780; font-family: monospace;\"\u003e📄 hugo-literature-reviewer.skill\u003c\/span\u003e\n    \u003cdiv style=\"width: 1px; height: 16px; background: #E8E6E0;\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n    \u003cspan style=\"font-size: 11px; color: #888780;\"\u003eUnder 2 min install\u003c\/span\u003e\n    \u003cdiv style=\"width: 1px; height: 16px; background: #E8E6E0;\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n    \u003cspan style=\"font-size: 11px; color: #888780;\"\u003eWorks with Claude, ChatGPT \u0026amp; any AI chat\u003c\/span\u003e\n  \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n  \u003cdiv style=\"border-left: 3px solid #1A8FA8; padding-left: 16px;\"\u003e\n    \u003cp style=\"font-size: 10px; font-weight: 600; color: #1A8FA8; letter-spacing: 0.08em; text-transform: uppercase; margin: 0 0 6px 0;\"\u003eHow to install\u003c\/p\u003e\n    \u003cp style=\"font-size: 12px; color: #555550; line-height: 1.7; margin: 0;\"\u003e\n      Download the .skill package → open Claude → paste SKILL.md into your Project Instructions or system prompt → share your sources or describe your topic and discipline → Hugo designs the structure and produces critical synthesis instantly. Provide your sources — Hugo works with what you supply and helps design the search strategy to find more.\n    \u003c\/p\u003e\n  \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Kissmyskills","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57640023556360,"sku":"hugo-literature-reviewer-ai-skill","price":29.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/1036\/1444\/7880\/files\/lr2-hugo-nf.png?v=1784793972","url":"https:\/\/kissmyskills.com\/he\/products\/hugo-literature-reviewer-ai-skill","provider":"KissMySkills","version":"1.0","type":"link"}