AI research prompts turn Claude or ChatGPT into a fast, structured research assistant — one that summarises long documents, compares sources, pulls out what matters, and helps you frame the right questions. The catch is the same as everywhere else: a vague prompt gets a vague, confident-sounding answer, which in research is the most dangerous kind. A good research prompt gives the AI the real material, asks for one specific output, and tells it to separate what the source says from what it is inferring.
This guide collects practical AI research prompts for summarising, comparing, extracting, and planning research. Each works with Claude, ChatGPT, or any AI chat. Copy it, paste in your document or topic, and fill in the brackets. One rule throughout: when the work matters, verify the AI's claims against the original source — these prompts speed up research, they do not replace checking it.
What makes a research prompt work
Research prompts live or die on two things: giving the AI the actual material rather than asking it to recall, and asking it to show its working. The strongest research prompts paste in the source and ask the AI to distinguish direct claims from inference, note what it is unsure about, and point back to where in the text a conclusion came from. That turns the AI from a confident narrator into a checkable assistant.
Summarising prompts
The most common research task is also the easiest to get wrong. These prompts produce summaries you can trust enough to act on.
Summarise this document for someone who needs to make a decision, not read the whole thing. Give me the three most important points, the key decision or finding, and anything surprising or counterintuitive. Then list one thing the document does not address that I might expect it to. Document: [PASTE TEXT]
Read this and produce a one-paragraph plain-English summary, then a bullet list of the specific claims it makes. For each claim, mark whether it is supported with evidence in the text or stated without it. Source: [PASTE TEXT]
Comparison and synthesis prompts
Research value often lives in the comparison — what these sources agree on, where they differ, and why.
Here are [NUMBER] sources on [TOPIC]: [PASTE SOURCES]. Produce a synthesis: where they agree, where they disagree, and the likely reason for the disagreement. Note which claims appear in only one source and should be treated with more caution.
Compare these two arguments on [TOPIC] fairly. For each, give the core claim, the strongest point in its favour, and its weakest link. Do not pick a winner — give me what I need to judge for myself. Arguments: [PASTE BOTH]
Extraction prompts
Often you do not need a summary — you need specific things pulled out of a long document.
Extract every [WHAT YOU NEED, e.g. statistic, date, named entity, recommendation] from this document and present them in a table with the surrounding context for each, so I can verify it against the source. Document: [PASTE TEXT]
Read this transcript and pull out the key decisions made, the action items with owners, and any open questions left unresolved. Quote the relevant line for each so I can check it. Transcript: [PASTE TEXT]
Research planning prompts
Good research is scoped before it starts. These prompts help you frame the question and design the approach.
I want to research [TOPIC] to answer this question: [QUESTION]. Help me scope it: break the main question into five sub-questions, suggest what kind of source would answer each, and flag the one sub-question that is most likely to change my conclusion.
I am researching [MARKET OR TOPIC]. Generate a structured research brief: what I am trying to learn, the key questions, the categories of source to look at, and the signals that would tell me my initial assumption is wrong.
Design a short survey to test [HYPOTHESIS] with [AUDIENCE]. Give me six to eight questions that avoid leading the respondent, a mix of scale and open questions, and a one-line note on what each question is measuring.
Turning sources into something you can use
These prompts take finished research and make it usable for others.
Turn this research into study notes for [LEVEL, e.g. revision, onboarding a colleague]. Organise by theme, define the terms that matter, and end with five questions that would test whether someone has actually understood it. Material: [PASTE TEXT]
From prompts to a complete research workflow
Individual prompts solve individual tasks. The researchers, analysts, and students who get the most from AI load their context once — the topic, the standard of evidence they hold to, the format they need — so every output comes back checkable and consistent. If you want a tested set rather than building your own, the KissMySkills learning and research prompt packs cover summarising, comparing, extracting, and planning, ready to use with Claude, ChatGPT, or any AI chat.
Summarising, comparing sources, extracting data, and planning research — prompt packs that go beyond generic templates. Works with Claude, ChatGPT, or any AI chat.
Browse research prompts →Browse all prompts →