如何使用 Claude 作為治療師的文件記錄助手：Sophia Skill 指南

No, and it is worth being specific about why rather than just saying no. A chat window is a place to write at any hour, and it can help you put words to something, draft what you want to tell a GP, or explain a term. What it cannot do is the part that matters: it agrees with the account you bring, so if you describe a situation in the shape your distress has given it, you get a thoughtful reply built on that shape that sounds like understanding. A therapist notices what you did not say and is willing to disagree with you about your own story. It also has no continuity, cannot see you getting worse over weeks, is not accountable, and cannot act. If you are thinking about harming yourself, contact your local emergency services or a crisis line in your country today.

Documentation, for qualified and registered therapists and counsellors. It drafts modality-appropriate session notes in formats such as SOAP, DAP and BIRP from your own post-session account, plus treatment-plan frameworks, intake structures, ending and referral letters, and practice documents. It does not provide therapy, counselling or mental-health advice, and every document it produces is a draft for the clinician to correct, personalise and sign.

It can reformat your own account into your note format, which is where the time actually goes. It must not add anything. The instruction that makes this safe is to forbid inference: use only what the clinician wrote, mark any required field with nothing behind it as NOT RECORDED rather than filling it, and never upgrade an observation such as seemed tired into clinical language. A note that reads more confidently than you remember the session is a liability rather than a time saving.

No, and this is the hardest line on the page. Risk assessment is clinical judgement with consequences, and a model will draft one fluently if you let it. A blank framework for the clinician to complete is the furthest this goes. A useful instruction in any note prompt is that if the account touches on risk, the model writes RISK: CLINICIAN TO COMPLETE and says nothing further.

Settle this once, before the workflow rather than inside it. Your professional body's ethical framework, your information-governance obligations and, in the UK and EU, GDPR treatment of special category data all bear on it, and the answer depends on your tier, your agreements and your jurisdiction. Practices that work regardless: draft from CLIENT placeholders, leave out dates of birth, addresses and identifying circumstances, and remember that a rare presentation plus a small town identifies someone as surely as a name does. If you are employed, this is a question for your information-governance lead first.

The clinician, without qualification. A session note is a legal clinical record. The model handles structure and prose; the clinician supplies every piece of clinical content, checks the draft against what actually happened, and signs it. Nothing about using a drafting tool changes professional or legal responsibility for the record.

Fluency that outruns your recollection, and quiet clinical upgrades where an observation becomes a diagnosis or a passing remark becomes a theme. It is also agreeable: ask whether a note is adequate and you will be told yes, so ask instead what a supervisor or an auditor would query. And it blends jurisdictions, since record-keeping requirements, retention periods and what a letter may contain differ by country, professional body and service.

No. Nothing here replaces supervision, and using a chat as a place to think through a difficult case is a different activity from drafting a note, with different confidentiality implications that should be considered separately.