Trademarks of their respective owners. KissMySkills is not affiliated with or endorsed by them.
How it works
Ask it something hard.
📎 ishaan-mathematician.txtLOADED ✓
Prove that a continuous function on a closed bounded interval is uniformly continuous, at final year undergraduate level.
CLAUDE · WITH THIS SKILLYou get: two intake questions first, because the brief did not say whether you want the compactness argument or the sequential one, and whether metric space generality is wanted -> then the statement restated with the exact hypotheses -> then the proof in numbered LaTeX steps, each naming the result it uses, Heine Borel at step 3 and the Lebesgue number lemma at step 5 -> then a check pass showing why closedness and boundedness are both needed, with the counterexample on an open interval that breaks it -> then a short note that the same proof fails on a non compact metric space, and the single next action: try the sequential version so you can compare which one your marker prefers.
Questions before you buy? A person answers, usually the same day: hello@kissmyskills.com
// the file itself
Read it before you buy it.
The first lines of the file your AI will read, exactly as delivered. Nothing rewritten for the page.
Use the name Once the file is loaded, talk to it by name: “Serge, check this page.” That is what the name is for. It also keeps several skills apart in one chat.
// the skill your AI runs on
You are Ishaan, a mathematician with research training and years of teaching who labels whether you are giving a proof, a heuristic argument or a numerical check. You have been activated to show the user working they can check line by line.
KissMySkills.com | Install: paste this whole file into Claude Projects (Project instructions), a custom GPT (Instructions), a Gemini Gem, or your AI's system prompt. Then just ask for what you need. You are a mathematician with research training and years of teaching behind you, equally comfortable with a clean epsilon delta argument and with a messy applied problem that needs a number by Friday. You optimise for a reader who can check every line, so you show working rather than conclusions. Your tone is calm and precise: you say "this holds because", you say "I cannot justify this step", and you never dress a guess as a result. · The difference between a proof, a heuristic argument, a numerical check and a plausibility claim, and you label which one you are giving. · Proof techniques and when each is right: direct, contrapositive, contradiction, weak and strong induction, pigeonhole, extremal principle, construction, and counterexample first when a statement smells false. · Real analysis: epsilon delta, subsequences, uniform versus pointwise convergence, compactness via Heine Borel and via open covers, the mean value theorem, monotone and dominated convergence. · Linear algebra: rank nullity, eigenvalue and singular value decompositions, positive definiteness, and why the normal equations square the condition number where QR does not. · Probability and combinatorics: conditional expectation, martingales, generating functions, inclusion exclusion, and the Markov, Chebyshev and Hoeffding inequalities. · Discrete mathematics and optimisation: graphs, recurrence relations, the master theorem, asymptotics with big O and big Theta kept apart, convexity, Lagrange multipliers, and the fact that a stationary point is not automatically a minimum. · Numerical practice: double precision gives roughly 16 significant digits, catastrophic cancellation when subtracting near equal quantities, stability versus accuracy, step size versus truncation error. · Notation: LaTeX throughout, explicit quantifier order, index ranges stated, and a declaration of whether zero is in your natural numbers, since it moves base cases. · Failure modes you check by habit: a proved induction step with an unchecked base case, dividing by a quantity that can be zero, swapping two limits, confusing necessary with sufficient, ignoring the domain when squaring both sides, and treating a numerical coincidence as evidence. · Verification tools: SymPy for symbolic checks, small case enumeration in Python, a numerical sweep for counterexamples, and dimensional analysis for applied work. Ask about these when they are not already clear, at most three questions in one message, then wait. 1. Level and audience. A first year exercise, a graduate seminar and a referee ready write up need different detail and different permitted background.
59 lines · .txt · instant download
// what's inside
What's inside this skill
Shows the working line by line and names the theorem behind each step
Marks anything it cannot derive as unverified instead of asserting it
Returns clean LaTeX you can paste straight into notes, a paper or slides
Runs a check pass on base cases, boundary values and hidden division by zero
Researchers, quants, engineers, lecturers and postgraduate students who need the working shown, not an answer asserted.
// two ways to get it
Use it inside your AI, or download it once.
Library plan
This skill and 2,500+ others, inside your chat
$9/mocancel anytime, or $59 a year
All 2,500+ skills, prompt packs and agents, loaded the moment you ask
Nothing to download or paste: connect once in Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code or Cursor
New skills every week and 10 catalog files a month to download
Trademarks of their respective owners. KissMySkills is not affiliated with or endorsed by them.
// ask your assistant
Or let your AI set up this skill for you.
Go to kissmyskills.com/pages/connector and set up the "Mathematician AI Skill - Ishaan" skill (handle: ishaan-mathematician) for me
Paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code, Cursor or Codex. Your AI walks you through connecting KissMySkills (about 3 minutes, 7-day free trial) and loads the skill. What your AI will read →
What you're actually buying
You ask a chatbot for a proof and get a confident paragraph with the hard step quietly skipped. You ask for an integral and get a number you cannot check. A mathematician ai should work the way a colleague at a whiteboard does: state the assumptions, show the working line by line, name the theorem behind each move, and say where the argument is not yet closed.
It asks who the answer is for, whether you want a proof or a computed result, and which notation you use, because a first year analysis exercise and a referee ready argument are different documents. You get the claim restated precisely, numbered steps in LaTeX, then a check pass: induction base cases, boundary values, and every place a division assumed a non zero quantity. A plausible chain of algebra is not a proof, so anything it cannot derive is marked unverified and paired with a counterexample search or a SymPy snippet you can run yourself.
The same file works in Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini. One purchase, pay once, keep forever, and it is installed in under two minutes.
// how to install
Under 2 minutes
Four steps. Any AI chat.
01
Download the file
After checkout, the download link lands in your inbox. Save the .txt file anywhere on your device.
02
Open your AI chat
Any AI chat you already use: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Copilot or another.
03
Paste the prompt
Open the .txt file, copy the prompt section and paste it into Claude or ChatGPT - or add it to a Project so it is always there.
04
Start working
Your AI is now configured as a specialist. Ask it anything inside its domain.
No technical knowledge required.
With Library there is nothing to download. Connect your AI once, then just ask: "Load Mathematician AI Skill from KissMySkills."
What does the mathematician ai skill actually do?+
It sets your AI up as a mathematician rather than an answer machine. It restates the problem precisely, asks what level and notation you need, then works in numbered steps with the theorem behind each one named. Every result it cannot derive is labelled unverified and given a concrete way to test it, usually a counterexample search or a short symbolic computation.
Can I trust the arithmetic and the algebra?+
Check it. Language models still slip on long symbolic manipulation and on sign errors. This skill is built around that: it keeps steps short, states each assumption, and ends with a verification section so mistakes surface. Where a result matters, it gives you SymPy or numerical code to run so the answer is confirmed outside the chat, not inside it.
Will it do my homework or my thesis for me?+
It is built to teach the argument, not hide it. Ask for a solution and you get the reasoning, the standard traps and the check pass, which is what you need to defend the work. It has no access to your course notes, your marking scheme or your supervisor's conventions, so tell it what those are or expect house style to differ.
Which AI tools does this skill work with?+
Works with Claude (recommended), Claude Code, ChatGPT, Gemini and Copilot, and any AI chat that accepts system prompts. Claude Projects gives the best results because it keeps your context between sessions.
Ready to give your AI a specialist?
This one and 2,500+ others, inside Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. Cancel anytime.