如何使用 Claude 擔任廣告文案撰寫人:Leo Skill 指南

Updated

廣告文案撰寫是最困難的寫作,因為可用的字數最少。五個字的標題、十五個字的描述、一行必須讓人停下來並採取行動的文字 - 沒有地方能藏起一個薄弱的字詞。使用 Claude 作為廣告文案撰稿人,就等於有一位夥伴協助你完成這種壓縮:像 Claude、ChatGPT 或任何 AI 聊天工具,都能將效益轉化為一句文案,撰寫數十種變化供你測試,並遵守每個平台施加的嚴苛字數限制。真正的工作就在文字本身 - 角度與測試策略則詳見我們的廣告創意指南

精簡、有說服力的廣告文案
Leo - 廣告文案撰寫 AI Skill
Leo - 廣告文案撰寫 AI Skill
$29這項 Skill 對比 $500每次活動,一位廣告文案撰稿人

精簡而具說服力的文案,依照每個平台的限制打造,數量足以應付實際測試需求,並搭配真正提出行動要求的行動呼籲。可搭配 Claude、ChatGPT 或任何 AI 聊天工具使用。

查看 Leo →

每行一項效益,銳利地表達

最常見的錯誤,是把三個賣點硬塞進一個標題,結果沒有一個真正發揮作用。這項 Skill 會撰寫文案,挑出最重要的那項效益並銳利地表達 - 因為只談一件事的一行文字,勝過什麼都想談的一行文字。知道該省略什麼的自律,是這門技藝最重要的部分。

從功能到效益,再到渴望

「500GB 儲存空間」是功能;「再也不用刪除照片」是效益;最好的廣告文案能觸及效益底下的渴望。這項 Skill 會完成這個轉譯 - 從產品本身是什麼,到讀者真正想要什麼 - 而這正是提供資訊的文案與能促成銷售的文案之間的差別。

為平台限制而打造

Google 標題、Meta 主要文字、展示型橫幅廣告、廣告看板 - 每種格式都有自己的字數限制和節奏。這項 Skill 會精準遵守限制,而不是交給你一段截到半個字的文案。將文字精簡到限制之內,本身就是一項 Skill。

許多變化,因為你會進行測試

好的廣告文案不是憑空寫出來的,而是測試出來的 - 你測試十句文案,其中兩句勝出。這項 Skill 能快速提供足夠的數量:針對鉤子、切入角度和行動呼籲進行各種變化,讓你進行真正的測試,而不是執著於某一句珍貴的文案。我們的轉換文案指南中的相同技巧,也能讓長篇說服內容更加精準。

真正提出要求的行動呼籲

許多廣告只做描述,最後卻忘了提出要求。這項 Skill 會撰寫明確告訴讀者下一步該做什麼的行動呼籲,並配合他們在行程中的階段 - 這就是令人讚賞的廣告與讓人點擊的廣告之間的差別。

為什麼 Skill 勝過一次性 prompt

一項完整的 Skill 會保留你的產品、語氣和成功文案,因此每一批新內容都能建立在過去已帶來轉換的成果上,而不是從零開始。在整個行銷活動中,這種複利效應能讓文案越來越精準。

坦白說,它有其限制

這項 Skill 能撰寫出強而有力的候選文案;真正能帶來轉換的是哪一句,只有市場才是裁判,而再巧妙的措辭也比不上實際測試。請將其輸出視為待測試的素材,讓點擊率和轉換數據選出勝者。以這種方式使用 Claude 作為廣告文案撰寫工具,能為你提供足夠的產量與技巧,攻克最艱難、最精簡的寫作任務。

相關 Skill 指南

KissMySkills 是一個提供 300 多種 AI 技能prompts代理免費工具的市集,適用於 Claude、ChatGPT 及任何 AI 聊天工具。

常見問題

Does Claude know the character limits for ad platforms?+

It will tell you a number confidently, and that is the problem. Limits differ by field, by placement and by ad type, they change, and they are not what you expect in every language. Google publishes that a responsive search ad headline supports up to 30 characters and a description up to 90, but also that in a double-width language such as Korean, Japanese or Chinese every character counts as two - so the same headline field is effectively 15. Supply the limit in your prompt and forbid the model from stating or correcting one.

Can AI count characters accurately?+

Not reliably. Text is broken into tokens before the model ever sees individual letters, so character counting is something these tools are structurally bad at. Have it print a count next to every line, because that is a useful sorting aid, then verify the counts yourself in a spreadsheet or a text editor. Three seconds of checking prevents an ad that truncates mid-word or gets rejected on submission.

What is the difference between writing to a limit and trimming to one?+

They produce completely different lines. Ask for a headline and then cut it to 30 characters and you get a mutilated sentence: it was built with a different rhythm and you have amputated the end. Set the width as the constraint before a single word exists and the line is conceived at that width. Compression is not editing. If an idea does not fit, the instruction should be to drop the idea rather than truncate the sentence.

How many ad variations should I generate?+

Far fewer than the model can produce, and the number is set by your budget rather than by its capacity. Every variant splits the same impressions, so beyond a handful none accumulates enough data to separate a real difference from noise, and the winner is whichever variant got lucky first. Two or three genuinely different claims tested properly beats fifteen phrasings tested badly. Use the model to find angles you had not considered, then throw most of them away before spending anything.

Why do my A/B tests never teach me anything?+

Usually because the variants differ on wording rather than on the claim. Save time on invoices and spend less time on invoices are the same promise, and running both costs money to learn what you already knew. Make each variant test a different claim: a different promise, a different objection answered, a different moment in the buyer's day, a different fear named. Then attach a hypothesis to each one and state in advance what result would prove the claim wrong rather than the phrasing.

Will AI write ad copy that gets rejected?+

It can, and it will not warn you. It reaches for superlatives, comparative claims, guarantees and second-person copy that asserts something about the reader, all of which are common rejection triggers. Run a disapproval pass before the copy reaches an ad account: ask it to review as a reviewer looking for reasons to reject, quoting the exact words, and to flag every superlative, every number and whether you or it supplied that number, and anything implying knowledge of the reader's health, finances, age or circumstances.

Can I ask the model what a platform's ad policy says?+

No, and this is the single most confidently wrong answer you will get from it. Platform policies change without announcement and the model answers from whatever version it last saw. Meta publishes a standard covering privacy violations and personal attributes within its advertising standards, Google has its own set, and each network differs. Use the model to flag where a line is risky. Read the current policy on the platform to decide whether it actually is.

How do I install the Leo skill?+

The download is a ZIP with SKILL.md at the root of the archive rather than inside a nested folder, which is the usual reason an upload fails. In the Claude desktop app open Customize, then Skills, upload the ZIP and toggle it on. Skills need code execution enabled, under Settings then Capabilities. Anthropic's help centre currently lists Skills on Free, Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise, while its Academy tutorial lists Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise, so if you are on the free plan check Settings then Capabilities for your own account rather than trusting either page. In ChatGPT or Gemini there is no upload step, so open SKILL.md, copy the contents and paste them into custom instructions.

~/get-started

實用的 Skills。不說空話。

瀏覽商店中的每個技能、prompt 套件和 agent。

瀏覽所有技能 →或試試免費工具