如何使用 Claude 擔任文案撰稿人:Olivia Skill 指南

Updated
適合創辦人與行銷人員
Olivia - 文案寫手 AI Skill
Olivia - 文案寫手 AI Skill
$14.99此 Skill 相較於 $150文案寫手,每小時

將一個檔案放進你的 AI,它就會依照簡報撰寫文案 - 登陸頁面、電子郵件、廣告 - 採用你設定的語氣,句子清楚而具體。無需訂閱。永久屬於你。

查看 Olivia →

你隔著房間就能認出 AI 文案:喘不過氣的開場、空洞的強調詞,以及承諾轉變和提升,卻始終沒說清楚實際會發生什麼事的動詞。當人們用一行 prompt 讓 Claude 撰寫文案時,這就是預設的語調 - 自信、泛泛而談,而且讀完就被遺忘。真正的 AI 文案寫手不追求令人印象深刻,反而會具體說明,而且聽起來像一個人在和另一個人交談。

Olivia 就是那位文案寫手。她是一個只需載入 Claude、ChatGPT 或任何 AI 聊天工具一次的人格設定;在知道三件事之前,她不會寫標題:你賣什麼、對象是誰,以及文案需要促成的單一行動。缺少這些條件寫出的文案只是裝飾;具備這些條件寫出的文案才能發揮作用。這個轉變 - 從填滿空間到推動讀者採取行動 - 就是全部重點。

為什麼泛用的 AI 文案缺乏說服力

若維持預設,一個聊天機器人會選擇炒作,因為炒作很容易。它提出沒有讀者相信的廣泛主張,讓每個品牌都用同一種語氣說話,列出功能,卻忘了說明這些功能對讀者有什麼作用。它也寫得冗長 - 把一個清楚的想法填充成三個句子,因為篇幅讓人感覺像是在努力。結果就是聽起來像行銷文案,卻無法說服任何人。

Olivia Skill 帶來的改變

Olivia 從簡報開始,並維持一致的語氣。告訴她受眾和期望的行動,她就會朝著這個目標撰寫,採用你設定的語調,而不是泛用的品牌文風。她用具體說法取代含糊的主張 - 讓讀者能想像的明確成果,而不是讀者會略過的形容詞。她毫不留情地刪除贅詞,以效益而非功能開頭,並提供幾個各具特色的選項供你挑選,而不是只給一個版本讓你接受或拒絕。

它實際上會產出什麼

著陸頁文案、電子郵件序列、廣告標題與內文、產品描述及標語 - 每項內容都依照需求說明並以你的語調撰寫。交給她一個現有頁面,她會協助精簡:更有力的開場、更清楚的主張,以及只要求一件事而非四件事的行動呼籲。

如何充分發揮它的效用

告訴她目標受眾,以及你希望讀者採取的唯一行動 - 這項單一限制對文案的影響勝過任何形容詞。貼上一段你喜歡的文字,讓她模仿其語調。要求呈現效益,而非功能,並要求提供多個版本,讓你可以測試而不是猜測。你的需求說明越具體,她的輸出就越不制式。

適合哪些人

自行撰寫網站內容的創辦人、快速完成行銷活動的行銷人員、團隊中沒有專職文案撰寫者的小型團隊,以及想更快完成初稿的自由工作者。它適用於 Claude、ChatGPT,或任何接受系統 prompt 的 AI 聊天工具。至於其他內容,創意與內容 Skill 系列涵蓋部落格寫作、社群媒體與品牌語調 - 每個都是專注的助理,而非一般聊天機器人。

相關 Skill 指南

KissMySkills 是一個提供 300 多種 AI Skillpromptsagents免費工具的市集,適用於 Claude、ChatGPT 及任何 AI 聊天工具。

常見問題

Can AI write copy that actually converts?+

It can produce a fast, competent draft, and competent is the problem. The default output is copy a competitor could honestly sign: fine sentences that cost a reader nothing to skip. Conversion comes from specifics the model does not have, which is your proof, your customer's actual objection and the one thing you can say that a rival cannot. Supply those in a brief and the draft is genuinely useful. Skip them and you get well-written filler at speed.

How do I stop AI copy from sounding like AI?+

Two moves, both concrete. Ban the default vocabulary by name in the prompt: transform, elevate, unlock, seamless, effortless, revolutionary, game-changing, robust, leverage, empower, cutting-edge, plus every intensifier that does not change the meaning of its sentence. Then give it a voice card extracted from three things you actually wrote, rather than describing a tone. Friendly and professional is a request for the average of the internet, which is exactly the sound you are trying to avoid.

What is the competitor test?+

Take any sentence and imagine your closest competitor's logo above it. If they could honestly put their name on it, the sentence says nothing. Built for teams who demand more. Quality you can trust. All fine, all signable by anyone. The same test in another form: if the opposite of your claim is absurd, it is not a claim, because nobody advertises unreliable service. A line is doing work only when a reasonable competitor could not honestly say it.

Will it invent statistics or testimonials?+

Yes, if you ask for persuasive copy without giving it evidence. It will produce plausible percentages, confident numbers and quotes from customers who do not exist. Published as marketing those are misleading commercial claims, and fabricating a testimonial is specifically prohibited conduct under the FTC's rule on consumer reviews and testimonials. The fix is one line in the drafting prompt: if a sentence needs a fact you have not supplied, it writes PROOF NEEDED and never fills the gap itself.

Can it handle claims about health, money or results?+

It will write them cheerfully, which is the risk. Superlatives, comparative claims, guarantees, up-to figures and anything touching health, finance or income are regulated ground in most markets, and the rules differ by country. Treat those lines as something a qualified person approves rather than something a model drafts. The audit prompt in this guide flags them separately for exactly that reason.

How many variants should I ask for, and how?+

Fewer than you think, and differing on the angle rather than the wording. Ask for five variants with no further instruction and you get one sentence phrased five ways, which tests synonyms and teaches you nothing. Name the leads instead: the outcome, the problem avoided, the objection answered, the proof point first, the comparison against what they use now, the cost of doing nothing. Then ask which one to test first and what result would prove the angle wrong rather than the wording.

Should I audit the copy in the same conversation that wrote it?+

No. A conversation that just produced the draft defends it, and asking whether the copy is good gets you a yes. Paste the copy into a fresh conversation with no context about who wrote it, and ask for quotes rather than a verdict: every sentence a competitor could sign, every claim with no evidence attached, every deletable intensifier, and the calls to action counted.

How do I install the Olivia skill?+

The download is a ZIP with SKILL.md at the root of the archive rather than inside a nested folder, which is the usual reason an upload fails. In the Claude desktop app open Customize, then Skills, upload the ZIP and toggle it on. Skills need code execution enabled, under Settings then Capabilities. Anthropic's help centre currently lists Skills on Free, Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise, while its Academy tutorial lists Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise, so if you are on the free plan check Settings then Capabilities for your own account rather than trusting either page. In ChatGPT or Gemini there is no upload step, so open SKILL.md, copy the contents and paste them into custom instructions.

~/get-started

實用的 Skills。不說空話。

瀏覽商店中的每個技能、prompt 套件和 agent。

瀏覽所有技能 →或試試免費工具