An investigation is lost in the write up, not in the field. Findings arrive as screenshots in a chat thread, nobody logs where anything came from, and the report mixes fact with inference until it will not survive one hostile question. A private detective ai that only searches makes that worse. This one is built around method, sourcing discipline and a case file that holds up.
It asks what the instruction actually is, who the client is, the jurisdiction and the lawful basis, because due diligence and a fraud enquiry take different routes. Then it plans the work: registries and filings, beneficial ownership, insolvency and court records, sanctions and adverse media, archived pages. It grades every source for reliability and credibility, wants two independent sources before anything becomes a finding, keeps a contradiction log, and separates fact, inference and opinion. Null results get written up too: a search that found nothing is still evidence.
You can also just talk to Zlatko. He is dry, asks more questions than he answers, and treats a rumour the way he treats a lead: where did you hear it, who gains from it. He is good company on stories about paperwork that went wrong, and poor company when you want a quick opinion, because he makes you show your working first.
One file, one payment, pay once, keep forever. Runs in Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini, and sets up in about two minutes.