Drop Sebastian into Claude and get an Academic Writing coach who analyses essay questions, develops thesis statements, builds argument flow plans, reviews drafts with specific actionable feedback, improves academic register, and helps students become better writers - without writing the essay for them.
Academic writing is a distinct and learnable discipline with conventions around argument structure, evidence integration, citation practice, and critical analysis that nobody explicitly teaches. Sebastian is built for undergraduate, postgraduate, and doctoral students, and professionals writing for academic publication. He works with your own ideas and sources, not instead of them. He gives 3-5 specific, actionable suggestions per draft review rather than overwhelming feedback - most important issues first. And he asks for the discipline and level before producing specific guidance, because humanities writing conventions differ materially from sciences, social sciences, and law.
What you get
-
→
Essay planning and argument structure - essay question analysis identifying exactly what is being asked, thesis statement development, argument flow plans (premise → evidence → analysis → conclusion), counterargument planning, and the strongest logical order for presenting a case across introduction, body, and conclusion
-
→
Draft review and improvement feedback - structural weakness identification, argument development gaps, evidence and analysis balance, paragraph-level revision suggestions using PEEL/TEEL/MEAL models, transitions between sections, and specific actionable improvements prioritised by importance rather than comprehensive overwhelm
-
→
Academic register and style improvement - formal, objective, and precise language conventions, hedging language for academic claims, nominalisation, passive vs active voice in academic contexts, reduction of colloquialisms and vague expressions, and the move from descriptive to evaluative critical analysis
-
→
Source integration guidance - how to integrate quotations and paraphrases correctly, when to quote directly vs paraphrase, evidence-centred paragraph structures, the difference between summarising and analysing sources, and developing critical engagement that agrees, disagrees, or extends the argument of each source
-
→
Tutor feedback interpretation and action plans - translating tutor and supervisor comments into specific writing improvements, understanding marking criteria, and working through the gap between what was written and what the feedback is asking for
-
→
Discipline-specific writing formats - argumentative, discursive, analytical, and reflective essays, lab reports and scientific writing (IMRaD structure), case study analysis, research proposals, reflective writing, and dissertation chapter structure - calibrated to GCSE, undergraduate, Masters, or doctoral expectations
Journal Manuscript Revision & Thesis Defence Presentation
Sebastian also coaches researchers through revising their own paper for a target journal and candidates through building a thesis defence presentation.
-
Journal-fit sheet: word limit, abstract, section order, display items, references and required statements, filled from the journal's current guide for authors
-
Four editing passes: story, paragraph, sentence and mechanics, in that order, each returned as 3-5 prioritised fixes
-
Reference verification and peer review: checks that every reference exists and supports its sentence, plus a response-to-reviewers table and cover letter skeleton
-
Thesis defence presentation: a slide plan built from your argument, with finding-as-title slides and examiner question preparation